US Using Democracy As ‘Weapon Of Mass Destruction’ To Stoke Confrontation: China On Biden’s Summit For Democracy

0
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

 

BEIJING, Dec 11 (PTI): China on Saturday accused the US of using democracy as a “weapon of mass destruction” to “stoke divisions and confrontation” as it slammed the Summit for Democracy organised by the Biden administration, which Beijing portrays as a new front being formed by America to isolate it to halt its rise.

The two-day summit attended by over 100 world leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, concluded on Friday with a call to evaluate progress in safeguarding fair elections, protecting human rights and fighting corruption.

While the US omitted China and Russia from the list of invitees, Beijing was furious over the invitation to the self-governing island Taiwan, which China said is a blatant violation of the ‘One China’ policy that considers Taipei as the integral part of the Chinese mainland.

In what could be Taiwan’s most high profile international conference for decades, its Minister without Portfolio Audrey Tang and Hsiao Bi-khim, head of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US, took part in the summit.

Tang, who spoke at a panel discussion on ‘Countering Digital Authoritarianism and Affirming Democratic Values’, said governments should work with civil society groups to develop digital democracy to tackle the various challenges facing the world, Taiwan media reports said.

Wrapping up the summit, Biden said, “A final message I want to impart as we close out this Summit for Democracy is that we know how hard the work is going to be ahead of us. But we also know we are up to the challenge.”

He said the two-day virtual gathering has demonstrated that the democratic world is everywhere.

Biden said autocracies can never extinguish the embers of liberty that burns in the hearts of people around the world, in every portion of the world.

“We’re committed to working with all who share those values, to shape the rules of the road that are going to govern our progress in the 21st century, including on issues of cybersecurity and emerging technologies so that future generations continue to reap the benefits of liberty and democracy, as we have,” he said.

The Chinese foreign ministry, which has been attacking the summit in the past few weeks, issued a lengthy statement accusing the US of stocking divisions in the name of democracy.

“Stoking division and confrontation in the name of democracy is to backpedal in history, and will bring nothing but turmoil and disaster to the world,” the statement said.

For a long time, the US has been imposing its political system and values on others, pushing for the so-called “democratic reforms”, abusing unilateral sanctions and inciting “colour revolutions”, which have caused “disastrous consequences”, it said.

“Democracy has become a weapon of mass destruction used by the United States to interfere in other countries’ affairs,” the statement said, asserting that the US ‘Summit for Democracy’ has “drawn the ideological line and turned democracy into a tool and a weapon”.

The US “sought to thwart democracy under the pretext of democracy, incite division and confrontation, and divert attention from its internal problems. It attempted to preserve its hegemony over the world, and undermine the international system with the United Nations at its core and the international order underpinned by international law”, the statement said.

Pakistan, which was invited to take part in the summit along with India and the Maldives, skipped it, apparently after a late-night phone call from Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi on December 4 where he criticised the meeting saying that what the US aims for is not democracy but hegemony.

The US is seeking to defend its dominant position in the world in the name of democracy, Wang had told Qureshi.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
Share.

Leave A Reply